Wednesday, April 11, 2012

你中癌了吗?1/2——治癌绩效制

上个星期天,朋友约我出来吃饭,吃完食物后闲聊,最后朋友介绍我向他买保险。
推荐给我的是医疗保险,买了它以后就可以专心生病了。
大意了解了一下详情,感觉上还蛮不错的。
在这个地沟油当食油来吃的年代,辐射漫天射的时代,每个人不患上一两种癌症就跟不上潮流了。
由于没有妹子关怀的关系,我很愤世嫉俗地认为:
我们花1/3人生的时间在拼命K书,接着再花1/3的人生拼命在赚钱,最后再花剩下的1/3的生命在治疗病痛
治疗病痛时花的钱当然是前大半辈子拼命赚来的。
现在买了保险,你可能不必再为这个而烦了,yeah~
好了,广告打完了,现在进入正题了。


说到中癌或其他疾病,我曾经向朋友说过,
你如果有什么病,最好是大众化的病,不要标新立异,生一些医学上之前没有记录的病。
原因是假设你生的一种是奇特的病,然后又是会致命的;但全球像你一样的病患却不超过1000人,那你可以准备等死了。
因为这个世界的医学研究问题都是看“市场机制”的,想一下,
你这个致命的病,之前没有过的。科学家要花多少人力、时间、财力来研究这个病的起因?
研究了病的起因,却又要研究病的治疗方法,这又是一个大工程。
好了,治疗方案出来了,又要一大推的临床试验、研究、分析等,再到最后才有药物应用在病人上。
当中还不包括记录病人用药后的副作用等等。。。
如果全球只有1000人有这个罕见的病,科学家、药物师、药物财团等花了这么多钱投资、研究、开发药物,
单单你们这1000条废柴的药物消费就可以让人家回本吗?更不要提赚钱了~
除非这1000名病患都是超级亿万富翁,否则没有人会投资这么多物力、人力、财力去研究“市场很小”的疾病的。
如果你得了罕见但又致命的病,然后又像我酱是穷光蛋的一个,基本上是可以准备去见马克思的了。
(当然,如果你喜欢资本主义可以选择去见亚当斯密夫)
但往乐观的方向看,你也可以“千古留名”,因为这个罕见的病很大可能像发现宇宙里的天体酱,以你的名字命名的
人生如此,算不错的啦。

这时候你可能庆幸自己患得不是什么“站在时代最前端”的新异疾病,而只是“普普通通的癌症”。
那我要很反高潮地介绍一篇文章:《一位年輕醫生吐露驚天秘密︰癌癥患者到死都不明白的事》
简单来说,这篇文章讲的就是:
1.医生有份「分紅」,做手术越多,医生分得越多。
2.就算病人100%没救了,医生也要“做手术开药方”。一来可以捞一笔,二来也可以“给家属们一个希望”。
3.就算病人不化疗也可以活下去,但医生为了照顾其他的“下流企业”,也要把治疗的步骤搞大,好让大家都有钱赚。
很黑暗对吗?至少对我来说是的,病人死前都要像一只猪酱,全身是宝地被人分掉。
首先去见外科治疗、外科抽够水后送你去内科、内科抽够水后又送你。。一直抽,抽到你干巴巴。。。

写的这么黑暗,结尾就来点“哲学”feel的结局,来提高一下我这篇post的等级。
如果你有癌症,剩下不到半年的性命。医生建议你化疗,治好的机会有30%,30%而已。
但在治疗的过程中,你会遭受很大的痛苦,如没有胃口、非常恐怖的痛、脱发、虚弱、瘦骨如柴等那些。。
(而且所谓的30%治好并不是真的100%满血复活,而只是“控制癌细胞的快速发展”)
就是俗语讲的“医返都变废柴”或“医返都晒药费”。
如果选择中医治疗,你没有任何病痛,活得很开心,安安心心快快乐乐地度过你人生的最后半年。
你会选择哪一个?中医还是西医?

听说唯一值得每个人去沉思的哲学问题是,“你为什么不去自杀?”
在生命的最后关头,苟且偷生下去不单止会连累他人,自己连最后的尊严都失去,
(听说因癌症而疼痛的病患,病痛时都恨不得马上往脑袋开一枪地死去),
在我们主流思想都认为活下去最好的时候,是不是应该认真思考,有时候死去也是对大家最好的选择?

你有想过,你为什么不去自杀吗?



相关链接   :癌事
                  :終局

11 comments:

  1. 听说因癌症而疼痛的病患,病痛时都恨不得马上往脑袋开一枪地死去

    看过一个很坚强的大男人,因中癌末期痛苦到变泪人,很是冲击,我认为有时活着痛苦没有尊严不如痛苦的死去。

    看你的文章都觉得你已经感悟人生人,不再是愤怒少年了。

    ReplyDelete
  2. 丽莲姐姐:
    //看过一个很坚强的大男人,因中癌末期痛苦到变泪人,很是冲击,我认为有时活着痛苦没有尊严不如痛苦的死去。//

    对,以其让他残酷地活着,安乐死对他、对家人甚至是对社会都是最好的安排。

    //看你的文章都觉得你已经感悟人生人,不再是愤怒少年了。//

    哈哈哈,我一直都是犬儒少年。。hmmm。。应该算是青年了,很老了。。。

    ReplyDelete
  3. 人终须一死,痛苦地活着,造成倾家荡产,不如简单地死去,省时省钱。既然有选择生存的权力,为何没有选择死去的权力? 我很支持安乐死条例。

    ReplyDelete
  4. Everybody is entitled to choices, especially when comes to one's life. If he feels the best thing to do is to die with dignity, then be it. Others may think that living is worth everything. Look at Steve Jobs, for him, even extending one single day of his life is gratifying to him. Values differs. Can't generalize.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 我是马来西亚人:
    // 我很支持安乐死条例。//

    我不是讨论安乐死,我是说如果有机会,你要博吗?而且就算博赢了也是半生死,还是放弃算了。(当中的考量当然是金钱和疼痛了)

    Anonymous:
    //Look at Steve Jobs, for him, even extending one single day of his life is gratifying to him. Values differs. Can't generalize.//

    i'm never generalize a conclusion that people who in lethal cancer should die or vice versa. Just want to discuss whether it worth or not to stay survive without any dignity and waste the money. i feel using Steve as an example are not appropriate, since many people that 'choose to die' are because they want to save the money, but i dont think Steve has such consideration .

    ReplyDelete
  6. Our old adage: 'Even ants choose to live' is enough to illustrate everything. Living has got a lot more meaning than is literally appreciable. In Steve's case, the fact that he has got cancer and a limited time left has actually make him achieved what he wouldn't have achieve otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Annon:

    //Our old adage: 'Even ants choose to live' is enough to illustrate everything. //

    1. Just a metaphor , our moral value do not rely on animal (or should i call it insect precisely) Same reason, i can give u a fact that even animals practice incest .Then are you practice incest relationship with your family? of course no! Why? because you have your own justification of the issue . Same here for the cancer, i do not rely on the animal's behaviour to justify my own philosophy
    2. As you say, it is an ' old adage', which means it has it own limitation in term of time. I don't think our ancestral can predict such condition in our time (cancer disease )
    3. Talk about ' old adage', first come in my mind about dead and alive is the quote which sound "死有重于泰山,也有轻于鸿毛" , which one is that ,if person choosing to terminate his own life during cancer?

    //. Living has got a lot more meaning than is literally appreciable//

    sure living are extremely meaningful, like the says "活着,就好"。 Once again, define living? Live without any lethal disease is living? or just breathing is living (even unable to eat, excrete,etc something...not yet mention that extremely painful attack)..if living is the latter, do u still think it is "iving has got a lot more meaning than is literally appreciable"?

    // In Steve's case, the fact that he has got cancer and a limited time left has actually make him achieved what he wouldn't have achieve otherwise.//

    Again,like my question on the post. If Steve has 2 choice, first one is do the chemotherapy treatment (which may save his life), but will make him extremely weak to do anything, second choice is do nothing , just live for your rest time (maybe half year)...so, which one he choose? try his best to stay survive whatever the cost ? or choose to "die" but to maximum his quality time to do something great? (well~it is depends on him, each people may have their own choice respectively)

    ReplyDelete
  8. cs said:
    在很多情况下,假如没什么选择了:即使一搏成功也活不了多几年,自己又会很痛苦,又会给身边的人带来太过巨大的沉重的负担,又没什么目标了,苟且拖延着也许真的没什么意义。
    说说而已,还没目睹或亲历….

    ReplyDelete
  9. 苟且拖延活下去算是活着吗?活得这么痛苦算是活着吗?有时候,安乐死掉,对大家都好~

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ηey there! Would уou mind іf I ѕharе your blog with my fаcebook gгοup?
    There's a lot of folks that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Many thanks
    Also see my webpage - http://howtoimpressmen.com

    ReplyDelete