Monday, August 27, 2012

蘇施黃的一和二

原本想寫三點,但只想到兩點,唯有露兩點。
最近在面子書上看到fb飛機場使用者,在那裡批評香港的美食主持人,蘇施黃
話說阿蘇她在一個公開場合裡,批評了大馬的食物不好吃,結果惹來網民的聲討,並要人家道歉。
根據報導,歉人家是道了,但我們還是意猶未盡地批判人家。
看了她“批判”大馬食物的影片,覺得她也許是在搞笑,
但退一萬步來說,考慮到她以毒舌聞名,就算她真的覺得我們的食物很難吃,那又怎樣?
有必要這麼生氣嗎?有必要要求人家道歉嗎?


食物口味是很個人的,怎麼可能要求每個人都會喜歡你的食物?
我們喜歡吃榴蓮,很多老外也不喜歡呀,難道又要逼人家老外道歉?
(當然,如果是老外批評我們的榴蓮不好吃,網上的聲討不會那麼重,原因講出來,大家都尷尬,不講好了~)
也許你會告訴我,大馬網友會這麼生氣,是因為阿蘇她“出言不遜”,
她不應該說“難吃”,她可以說“馬來西亞食物不是很適合我的口味”等等。。
但大馬知名講師兼暢銷作家江魔江老師,在其fb塗鴉牆上對此現象,說了些感想。
江老師說“人家講你的食物不好吃就生氣的話,你對你所鍾愛的食物,是一種信仰。”

我一直以來對那些宗教分子沒有好感,覺得宗教的排他性,是導致世界紛爭的源頭之一。
宗教的神聖性(應該叫作自我造完美神來滿足自己的神聖性),讓宗教幾乎信徒不能接受自己的信仰遭到詆毀或批評。
只要某些蠢人遭到某些聰明人的利用和煽動,刺激了。。。
可能你會說這不關宗教的事情,宗教是“導人向善的”,壞的是人心,不是宗教,不能怪宗教。
這點我也同意,就像伊朗總統和朝鮮領導人應該這樣對美國說,
核武器不是惡魔,險惡的是人心,核技術是造福人群的,讓全世界一起發展核武吧~
扯遠了。。。
宗教分子的洗腦,我們還可以看得見。但這些“國家榮耀”的洗腦,是不是比較難察覺?
當人家封我們(或我們自封)是“美食之都”,當有個人說不好吃時,我們就像那些基本教義派那樣發神經,
這種情況,何嘗又不想那些塔利班分子為了“偉大的主”而發動戰爭呢?
我們都被教導好了,大馬的食物好吃、大馬人熱情好客、大馬的風景鬼斧神工;
當有個人覺得大馬食物不好吃、大馬人沒禮貌、大馬的風景平平無奇,
我們就像那些相信“神造世人”的信徒看到進化論那樣,發現自己的祖先不是“神”,
而是有點像猴子時,那樣的憤怒、那樣的歇斯底里、那樣的不可理喻。
當然,應該不會有人為了一碗肉骨茶,而發動戰爭的。

第二就是,要反駁阿蘇的言論,其實有很多種,但為什麼選擇攻擊她的性取向呢?
阿蘇在香港之所以受歡迎(討厭她的人也不少),是在於她的毒舌。
也因為毒舌出名,表示了她不是以專業鑑賞食物而聞名。
她也以“不公平”、“幫自己人”而聞名,基本上在美食上,沒有什麼權威指數。
要反駁她(好不好吃很難反駁),可以說比她senior的蔡瀾、濤哥等前輩老饕,都時常風塵僕僕地來馬大快朵頤。
年輕的還有我喜歡的道長,雖然道長講一大堆文化歷史多過談食物。
指出蔡瀾濤哥等前輩讚美大馬食物的權威,
或以道長那種什麼文化歷史南洋情來為我們增值(其實獨特的南洋文化才是我們食物的強項),都可以輕輕鬆松地反駁完全沒有鑑賞美食權威的她的言論。
但,為什麼攻擊人家是同性戀的身份呢?
這裡可以看得出,我們的公民。還真的很。。。

有沒有發現,如果是女人做錯事,相對於男人,她們受的攻擊會比較多?
如徐月風、公平姐、和我最喜歡的拖車姐,她們的錯誤都被網友無情的攻擊。
相比之下,那些腦殘的男性政客,說/做的蠢事和壞事已經罄竹難書,但聲討的壓力適合少很多。
徐月風導致霹靂變天?請問其他一起跳的公正黨男YB叫什麼名字?
不去Google而能立刻念的出的,本博客打賞RM1大洋。
公平姐的公平理論,副揆丁少和土權阿里等,已經說過不少次了,但只有公平姐中招。
拖車姐的腦殘言論只屬於小咖級的,根本不至於需要去反駁,但她還是受到嚴厲的惡搞。
這些因素,不知道是巧合還是大馬真的有歧視女性之嫌,需要嚴格地探討。
(不要告訴我惡搞她們的網友也有女性,所以不算是歧視女性。因為在父權霸權下,產生斯德哥爾摩病症的女性,會“為虎作倀”的。當然,她們不知道自己被“主流價值”洗腦了,情況就像上面第一點提到的信仰那樣。)

大馬人要自由人權?哈哈哈!

相關文章
阿瓜——父權文化下的歧視
Facebook毒素2/3——雲端裡的飛機場

13 comments :


  1. First , as a HK ppl , she maybe not accustomed to our country eat drink culture , we can understand , but u cant make a conclusion said that whole msia food sucks .

    second , msia too much delicious food , She is no chance to taste, probably will not appreciate, but do not appreciate means can talk nonsense

    third , She was a spokesperson is received the bill of tpf, even if the taste ok , must also be look n said delicious. but we have to eat n pay the bill, can not let you look down by Tang PAKFU's spokesperson, and to be led by the nose , buy ur product and humiliate by hell thing

    fourth , malaysia food maybe lose compare to other country , but their ethnicity dignity not lose to other country (except politician we noe want but not all )

    Malaysian is very forgetful, that is real fact.
    Hong Kong is a gourmet's paradise, but does not mean that all are delicious.But looking wrong spokesperson, is to belittle others to elevate themselves not do business with the most mistakes. probelm come form mouth , so need to take the responsibility

    as my fren said and i agree he said:
    In other way, mayb she ate some cheapskate stuff and got diarhea and some shit. u know, its normal ppl may had given poor comments due to bad experience.

    I wont care what she said. I will still try it out before making any comment. Please dont politicize foods, for goodness sake.
    sensitive malaysians is sensitive. I do sense epic news coming soon in days time, with all the boycott and stuff going on, they learn from mainland.
    but it can just be a small situational joke, but malaysians love boycott. they love politics very much.


    Frederic Moi

    ReplyDelete
  2. 他很烂,我可以不喜欢他,但他没得罪我,基于礼貌。所以我没必要出言指责他。这道理。他懂吗?

    我只是觉得如果他吃到的食物难吃,他可以不喜欢,况且以茨厂街那几档食物来评论大马食物难吃?基于礼貌,他没必要出言如此评论。

    ReplyDelete
  3. FM:
    //First , as a HK ppl ,...//

    1. What make you think that peoples from other food cultural cannot critic our food? If this apply, then whether we have to reject the praise from peoples that do not accustomed with Malaysian food?

    2. Same. If she only taste few Malaysian food (let say 1% of total), and she concluded that 'Malaysian food is good!'.In this case, will you oppose her opinion and said her conclusion might wrong because she never taste all Malaysian food, which potential contains suck food and that will subvert her initial conclusion?

    3. Maybe she do a wrong PR for Tang PAKFU', but this is nothing to do with my 2 points in this article.

    4. Even our food contains 'ethnicity dignity' still cannot enforce the argument that our food are good in taste, cus this very subjective, if she feel suck, it is suck, no matter how 'ethnicity dignity' we have.

    // Please dont politicize foods, for goodness sake.
    sensitive malaysians is sensitive. //

    That was the issue that i try to raise, why peoples will feelinsulted when our food being criticized? Is food got something to do with some kind of religious belief? Are we being brainwashed by that our 'food superiority' cannot be challenged?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous:
    //他很烂,我可以不喜欢他,但他没得罪我,基于礼貌。所以我没必要出言指责他。这道理。他懂吗?

    我只是觉得如果他吃到的食物难吃,他可以不喜欢,况且以茨厂街那几档食物来评论大马食物难吃?基于礼貌,他没必要出言如此评论。//

    1. 她有沒有禮貌不是我想探討的重點。
    2. 她是食評家(姑且不論是否稱職、是否有代表性),食物不好吃,她有責任講出來。這樣才能對得起看她節目的觀眾
    3. 她才吃了一兩樣食物就說大馬食物不好吃,是犯了以偏概全的錯誤。但像我上面講的,如果她也是“只吃了茨厂街幾樣食物”,就說全馬來西亞的食物好吃,同樣是以偏概全的毛病。但後者我們不會去批評她,為什麼?這樣的態度叫“輸打贏要”,那些宗教分子很喜歡用的。這才是我這篇文章試圖討論的論點,我們是否把食物(或大馬的其他東西),神化而不知?

    ReplyDelete
  5. 秀男:
    //你是同志?//

    秀男你好,第一次留言對嗎?歡迎光臨!
    不,我是男生,喜歡女生。但我這個博客寫了“很多”支持LGBT的post,從以下這篇,你可以link去看我之前寫過關於LGBT的文章。
    断袖之恋4

    我大意猜到你為什麼會這樣問。你看到我為同性戀身份“申冤”,可能就會認為我也是其中一分子。其實這樣的心態很不好,我認為每個人應該將心比心。你不需要是女生,才能支持女權。你不需要是動物,才能支持保護動物協會。以此類推~

    ReplyDelete
  6. 最好她把在哪个食档吃到难吃的食物公开出来,让大众去检验啦,还有好不好吃是很主观的。 刚听朋友的对同性恋的牧师的看法,他觉得要成为牧师,一定不可以是或支同性恋,无言。

    ReplyDelete
  7. 是說歐陽文風牧師嗎?哈哈,他也寫了很多以宗教的觀點來支持同性戀的書籍,可惜到現在為止還沒機會拜讀~

    ReplyDelete
  8. When the fast time I heard about such funny news, my first reaction are like fuck u. But then I thought it through again, I realize she can say whatever she wants. Whoever love it will still love it, whoever hates it will still hates it. It just like durian. Why make a fuss out of it?

    And about the gay and Christian stuff. I can only say bible in nature are quite hostile towards homosexual. Don't get me wrong, I am not a gay hater or anything like that, I just want to make a point about bible hates many things and it sure tells a lot of stories. If you want, you will find saint Paul sometimes wrote something ridiculous about women.

    Bible is just a book written in the past by wise men. But since they lived in the past, we need to realize they were bound by the cultural and historical limitation.

    In short, bible is not absolute in my own opinion. Indeed it is our holy text, but reading it without proper knowledge and wisdom, will either find the paradoxes within it was too hard to bear or just being a blind faith believer ( which themselves will be full of paradoxes.)

    Paul H.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The problem occurred when believers claim that the contain of Bibles are 100% valid and true. They need to give more explanation to cover up the paradoxes, which actually crate more paradoxes for the bible...

    ReplyDelete
  10. CS said..
    For the 100% believer, can we ask them: "ei? where is it recorded in bible on Dinosaur ah?? so, is dinosaur existence merely a lie??"
    :P :P

    ReplyDelete
  11. surf to youtube and search 'Bible proved dinosaur existed', then you might find a video. 哈哈,問你死咩?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Haha. They can even find UFO within the bible if you want(search on web if you don't believe). As I said, you can find all kind of things in bible. About the first chapter of bible, Genesis, in my opinion are mostly metaphor. 7 days of creating earth? God's 7 days might not be 7 days of men. And blah blah blah, it just like Greek Myth. Be serious of it words by words? I need to say that God gave us brains and civilization for a reason.
    Christian or not, we still got our brain to use.

    Paul H.

    ReplyDelete